New compounds of corrosion inhibitors namely amino-N’-(3-(hydroxyimino)butan-2-ylidene)-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[b]thiophene-3-carbohydrazide (1), amino-N’-(thiophen-2-ylmethylene)-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[b]thiophene-3-carbohydrazide (2) and amino-N’-(1-(pyridin-2-yl)ethylidene)-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[b]thiophene-3-carbohydrazide (3) were synthesized and its inhibiting action on the corrosion of carbon steel in 1 M hydrochloric acid at 25ºC was investigated by various corrosion monitoring techniques. A Potentiodynamic polarization, AC impedance and electrochemical frequency modulation methods have been used. Potentiodynamic polarization studies showed that these derivatives were mixed type inhibitors. The effect of temperature on the corrosion behavior of carbon steel in 1 M HCl with the addition of these compounds were studied in the temperatures 25 and 45ºC. The adsorption of these inhibitors on carbon steel surface from hydrochloric acid obeyed the Langmuir adsorption isotherm. Quantum chemical method is used to explore the relationship between the inhibitors molecular properties and their inhibition efficiency.
1. Introduction
Corrosion of materials cause’s big losses in the economy of many countries due to the huge amount of funds needed in order to reduce it. Corrosion inhibition of metals, especially of steel, has received a lot of attention because of its widespread use in the industry such as the oil and gas [1], beverage, metallurgy among others, and thus, a lot of research in the field of corrosion inhibition of steel is necessary. Aqueous solutions of acids are among the most corrosive media and are widely used in industries for pickling, acid cleaning of boilers, descaling and oil well [2, 3]. The main problem concerning C- steel applications is its relatively low corrosion resistance in acidic solution.Several methods used currently to reduce corrosion of C- steel. One of such methods is the use of organic inhibitors [4-7]. Effective inhibitors are heterocyclic compounds that have л bonds, heteroatoms such as sulphur, oxygen and nitrogen [8[. Compounds containing both nitrogen, sulphur and oxygen atoms can provide excellent inhibition, compared with compounds containing only two atoms from the three atoms [9[. Heterocyclic compounds such as thiophene 3-carbohydrazide derivatives can provide excellent inhibition. These molecules depends mainly on certain physical properties of the inhibitor molecules such as functional groups, steric factors, electron density at the donor atom and electronic structure of the molecules] 10, 11]. Many N-heterocyclic compounds have been used for the corrosion inhibition of metals, such as imidazoline [12], triazole [13-15], tetrazole [16], pyrrole [17], pyridine [18], pyrazole and bipyrazole [19, 20], pyrimidine [21], pyridazine [22], and some derivatives. Some heterocyclic compounds containing a mercapto group have been developed as copper corrosion inhibitors. These compounds include: 2-mercaptobenzothiazole [23], 2,4-dimercapto pyrimidine [24], 2-amino-5-mercaptothiadzole, 2-mercaptothiazoline [25], potassium ethyl xanthate [26], indole and derivatives [27] and some thiophene derivatives [28-31].
The purpose of this paper is to compare the corrosion inhibition data derived from EFM with that obtained from Tafel extrapolation and EIS techniques and to discuss the relationship between quantum chemical calculations and experimental protection efficiencies of the tested compounds.
2. Experimental Details
2.1 Materials and Solutions
Experiments were performed using carbon steel specimens with composition (weight %): C 0.2, Mn 0.35, P 0.024, Si 0.003 and Fe is the rest. Hydrochloric acid (37%), ethyl alcohol and acetone were purchased from Al-Gomhoria Company, Egypt. Bidistilled water was used throughout all the experiments. These derivatives were synthesized as before [32] and their chemical structures are shown in Table 1.
2.2 Electrochemical measurements
The experiments were carried out potentiodynamically in a thermostated three electrode cell. Platinum foil was used as counter electrode and a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) coupled to a fine Luggin capillary as the reference electrode. The working electrode was in the form of a square cut from C- steel under investigation and was embedded in a Teflon rod with an exposed area of 1 cm2. This electrode was immersed in 100 ml of a test solution for 30 min until a steady state open-circuit potential (Eocp) was attained. The potentiodynamic curves were recorded by changing the electrode potential from -1.0 to 0.0 V versus SCE with scan rate of 1 mVs-1. All experiments were carried out in freshly prepared solution at constant temperature (25oC) using a thermostat.%IE and the degree of surface coverage (θ) were defined as:
Equation 1:
% IE = θ x 100 = [(icorr – icorr(inh)) / icorr] x 100
where icorr and icorr(inh) are the uninhibited and inhibited corrosion current density values, respectively, determined by extrapolation ofTafel lines.
The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) spectra were recorded at open circuit potential (OCP) after immersion the electrode for 30 min in the test solution. The ac signal was 5 mV peak to peak and the frequency range studied was between 100 kHz and 0.2 Hz.
The inhibition efficiency (% IE) and the surface coverage (θ) of the used inhibitors obtained from the impedance measurements were calculated by applying the following relations:
Equation 2:
% IE = θ x 100 = [1-(R°ct/Rct)]
Where, Roct and Rct are the charge transfer resistance in the absence and presence of inhibitor, respectively.
EFM experiments were performed with applying potential perturbation signal with amplitude 10 mV with two sine waves of 2 and 5 Hz. The choice for the frequencies of 2 and 5Hz was based on three arguments [33]. The larger peaks were used to calculate the corrosion current density (icorr), the Tafel slopes (βc and βa) and the causality factors CF-2 and CF-3 [34].
All electrochemical experiments were carried out using Gamry instrument PCI300/4 Potentiostat/Galvanostat/Zra analyzer, DC105 Corrosion software, EIS300 Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy software, EFM140 electrochemical frequency modulation software and Echem Analyst 5.5 for results plotting, graphing, data fitting and calculating.
2.3 Theoretical study
Accelrys (Material Studio Version 4.4) software for quantum chemical calculations has been used.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1 Potentiodynamic polarization measurements
Figure 1 shows the potentiodynamic polarization curves for C- steel without and with different concentrations of compound (1) at 25oC. Similar curves for other compounds were obtained (not shown).The obtained electrochemical parameters; cathodic (βc) and anodic (βa) Tafel slopes, corrosion potential (Ecorr), and corrosion current density (icorr), were obtained and are listed in Table 2. Results of this Table show that icorr decreases by adding the thiophene 3-carbohydrazide compounds and by increasing their concentrations. In addition, Ecorr does not change obviously. Also ba and bc do not change markedly, which indicates that these compounds are mixed type inhibitors [35, 36]. The parallel Tafel lines, indicate that there is no change in the mechanism of the corrosion reaction of C- steel. Figure 1 clearly shows that both anodic and cathodic reactions are inhibited. The inhibition achieved by these compounds decreases in the following order: (3)> (2)> (1).
3.2 Adsorption isotherms
The adsorption isotherms are considered to describe the interactions of the inhibitor molecule with the active sites on the metal surface [37]. Attempts were made to fit Ө values to various isotherms including Frumkin, Langmuir, Temkin, and Freundlich. The results were best fitted by far by the Langmuir adsorption isotherm which has the following equation [29-30]:
Equation 3:
C/Ө = 1/Kads+ C
where C is the concentration ofthiophene 3-carbohydrazide; Kads is the adsorptive equilibrium constant; and Ө is the surface coverage of thiophene 3-carbohydrazideon C- steel, which can be calculated by the ratio of IE/100 for different thiophene 3-carbohydrazide concentration [38]. Figures (2 and 3) show the straight lines of C/ Ө vs. C at T1 (25 oC) and T2 (45oC), respectively.
Moreover, the adsorption heat can be calculated according to the van’t Hoff equation [38]:
Equation 4:
Ln Kads = ΔH0ads/RT+ const
where ΔH° is the adsorption heat, R is the gas constant, T is the absolute temperature, K1 and K2 are the adsorptive equilibrium constants at T1 (25°C) and T2 (45°C), respectively. In consideration that the experiments proceed at the standard pressure and the solution concentrations are not very high, which are close to the standard condition, the calculated adsorption heat thus can be approximately regarded as the standard adsorption heat ∆H°ads.The negative values of ΔH° Table (3) reflect the exothermic behavior of the adsorption of thiophene 3-carbohydrazide derivatives on the C- steel surface. The standard adsorption free energy (∆G°ads) can be obtained according to the following equation [39-40]
Equation 5:
Kads=1/55.5 exp (-∆G°ads/RT)
The negative values of ∆G٥ads (Table 3) suggest that the adsorption of thiophene 3-carbohydrazide derivatives on the C- steel surface is spontaneous. Generally, the values of ∆G°ads around or less than -20 kJ mol-1 are associated with the electrostatic interaction between charged molecules and the charged metal surface (physisorption); while those around or higher than -40 kJ mol-1 mean charge sharing or transfer from the inhibitor molecules to the metal surface to form a coordinate type of metal bond (chemisorption). The ∆Gºads values listed in Table (3) are around -20 kJ mol-1, which means that the absorption of thiophene 3-carbohydrazide derivatives on the C-steel surface belongs to the physisorption and the adsorptive film has an electrostatic character [41, 42]. Finally, the standard adsorption entropy ∆S°ads can be calculated by the following Equation:
Equation 6:
∆S°ads = (∆H°ads -∆G°ads) /T
The (DS°ads) values (Tab. 3) are positive, which are opposite to the usual expectation that the adsorption is an exothermic process and always accompanied by a decrease of entropy. The reason can be explained as follows: the adsorption of thiophene 3-carbohydrazide inhibitor molecules from the aqueous solution can be regarded as a quasi-substitution process between the thiophene 3-carbohydrazide compound in the aqueous phase and water molecules at the electrode surface [H2O (ads)] [43-46]. In this situation, the adsorption ofthiophene 3-carbohydrazide derivativesis accompanied by the desorption of water molecules from the electrode surface .Thus, while the adsorption process for the inhibitor is believed to be exothermic and associated with a decrease in entropy of the solute ,the opposite is true for the solvent [47]. The thermodynamic values obtained are the algebraic sum of the adsorption of thiophene 3-carbohydrazide inhibitor molecules and the desorption of water molecules. Therefore, the gain in entropy is attributed to the increase in solvent entropy. The positive values of (DSºads) suggest that the adsorption process is accompanied by an increase in entropy, which is the driving force for the adsorption of thiophene 3-carbohydrazide derivatives on the C-steel surface. Table (3) lists all the above calculated thermodynamic parameters.
3.3 Effect of temperature
The importance of temperature variation in corrosion study involving the use of inhibitors is to determine the mode of inhibitor adsorption on the metal surface. Recently, the use of two temperatures to establish the mode of inhibitor adsorption on a metal surface has been reported and has been found to be adequate [48, 49]. Thus, the influence of temperature on the corrosion behavior of C- steel in 2 M HCl in the absence and presence of thiophene 3-carbohydrazide derivatives were investigated by polarization method at 25 and 45°C. Therefore, in examining the effect of temperature on the corrosion process, the apparent activation energies (Ea) were calculated from the Arrhenius equation [50]
Equation 7:
Log (ρ2/ρ1) = (Ea/2.303R) (1/T1-1/T2)
where ρ2 and ρ1 are the corrosion rates at temperature T1 and T2 respectively. An estimate of heat of adsorption was obtained from the trend of surface coverage with temperature as follows [45]:
Equation 8:
Qads= 2.303R [log (θ2/1-θ2) – log (θ1/1-θ1)] x (T1xT2/T1-T2) kJ mol-1
where θ1 and θ2 are the degrees of surface coverage at temperatures T1 and T2. The calculated values for both parameters are given in Table (4). Increased activation energy (Ea) in inhibited solutions compared to the blank suggests that the inhibitor is physically adsorbed on the corroding metal surface. It is seen from Table (4) that E*a values were higher in the presence of the additives compared to that in their absence hence leading to reduction in the corrosion rates. It has been suggested that adsorption of an organic inhibitor can affect the corrosion rate by either decreasing the available reaction area (geometric blocking effect) or by modifying the activation energy of the anodic or cathodic reactions occurring in the inhibitor-free surface in the course of the inhibited corrosion process [51]. The E*a values support the earlier proposed physisorption mechanism. Hence, corrosion inhibition is assumed to occur primarily through physical adsorption on the C- steel surface, giving rise to the deactivation of these surfaces to hydrogen atom recombination. Similar results have been reported in earlier publications [52]. The negative Qads values indicate that the degree of surface coverage decreased with rise in temperature, supporting the earlier proposed physisorption mechanism [53].
3.4 Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements
The corrosion of C- steel in 2 M HCl in the presence of the investigated compounds was investigated by EIS method at 25 oC after 30 min immersion. Nyquist plots in the absence and presence of investigated compound (1) is presented in Figure (4). Similar curves were obtained for other inhibitors but not shown. It is apparent that all Nyquist plots show a single capacitive loop, both in uninhibited and inhibited solutions. The impedance data of C- steel in 2 M HCl are analyzed in terms of an equivalent circuit model Figure (5) which includes the solution resistance Rs and the double layer capacitance Cdl which is placed in parallel to the charge transfer resistance Rct [54] due to the charge transfer reaction? For the Nyquist plots it is obvious that low frequency data are on the right side of the plot and higher frequency data are on the left. This is true for EIS data where impedance usually falls as frequency rises (this is not true for all circuits). The capacity of double layer (Cdl) can be calculated from the following equation:
Equation 9:
Cdl = 1/2πfmaxRct
where fmax is maximum frequency. The parameters obtained from impedance measurements are given in Table (5). It can see from Table (5) that the values of charge transfer resistance Rct increase with inhibitor concentration [55]. In the case of impedance studies, % IE increases with inhibitor concentration in the presence ofinvestigated inhibitors and the % IE of these investigated inhibitors is as follows: (3)> (2)> (1).
The impedance study confirms the inhibiting characters of these compounds obtained from potentiodynamic polarization. It is also noted that the Cdl values tend to decrease when the concentration of these compounds increases. This decrease in Cdl, which can result from a decrease in local dielectric constant and/or an increase in the thickness of the electrical double layer, suggests that these compounds molecules function by adsorption at the metal/solution interface [56].The inhibiting effect of these compounds can be attributed to their parallel adsorption at the metal solution interface. The parallel adsorption is owing to the presence of one or more active center for adsorption.
3.5 Electrochemical frequency modulation (EFM) measurements
EFM is a nondestructive corrosion measurement technique that can directly and quickly determine the corrosion current value without prior knowledge of Tafel slopes, and with only a small polarizing signal. These advantages of EFM technique make it an ideal candidate for online corrosion monitoring [57]. The great strength of the EFM is the causality factors which serve as an internal check on the validity of EFM measurement. The causality factors CF-2 and CF-3 are calculated from the frequency spectrum of the current responses. Figs (6) shows the frequency spectrum of the current response of C- steel in 2 M HCl, contains not only the input frequencies, but also contains frequency components which are the sum, difference, and multiples of the two input frequencies. The EFM intermodulation spectrums of C- steel in 2 M HCl acid solution containing (15 x 10-6 M) of the studied compound (1) are shown in Fig (6). Similar results were recorded for the other concentrations of the investigated compounds (not shown). The harmonic and intermodulation peaks are clearly visible and are much larger than the background noise. The two large peaks, with amplitude of about 200 µA, are the response to the 40 and 100 mHz (2 and 5 Hz) excitation frequencies. It is important to note that between the peaks there is nearly no current response (<100 nA). The experimental EFM data were treated using two different models: complete diffusion control of the cathodic reaction and the “activation” model. For the latter, a set of three non-linear equations had been solved, assuming that the corrosion potential does not change due to the polarization of the working electrode [58]. The larger peaks were used to calculate the corrosion current density (icorr), the Tafel slopes (βc and βa) and the causality factors (CF-2 and CF-3). These electrochemical parameters were simultaneously determined by Gamry EFM140 software, and listed in Table (6). The data presented in Table (6) obviously show that, the addition of any one of tested compounds at a given concentration to the acidic solution decreases the corrosion current density, indicating that these compounds inhibit the corrosion of C- steel in 2 M HCl through adsorption. The causality factors obtained under different experimental conditions are approximately equal to the theoretical values (2 and 3) indicating that the measured data are verified and of good quality [59]. The inhibition efficiencies %IEEFM increase by increasing the studied inhibitors concentrations was calculated as follows:
Equation 10:
%IEEFM = [(1- icorr/ iocorr )] x 100
Where iocorr and icorr are corrosion current densities in the absence and presence of inhibitor, respectively. The inhibition sufficiency obtained from this method is in the order: (3)> (2)> (1).
3.6 Quantum chemical calculations
Theoretical calculations were performed for only the neutral forms, in order to give further insight into the experimental results. Values of quantum chemical indices such as energies of LUMO and HOMO (EHOMO and ELUMO), the formation heat ∆Hf and energy gap ∆E, are calculated by semi-empirical PM3 methods has been given in Table (7). The reactive ability of the inhibitor is related to EHOMO, ELUMO [60]. Higher EHOMO of the adsorbent leads to higher electron donating ability [61]. Low ELUMO indicates that the acceptor accepts electrons easily. The calculated quantum chemical indices (EHOMO, ELUMO, µ) of investigated compounds are shown in Table (7). The difference ΔE= ELUMO-EHOMO is the energy required to move an electron from HOMO to LUMO. Low ΔE facilities adsorption of the molecule and thus will cause higher inhibition efficiency. The energy gap ΔE decreases as follows: (3 > 2 > 1). This fact explains the decreasing inhibition efficiency in this order (3 > 2 > 1, as shown in Table (7). Figure (7) shows the optimized structures of the three investigated compounds. So, the calculated energy gaps show reasonably good correlation with the efficiency of corrosion inhibition. Table (7) also indicates that compound (3) possesses the lowest total energy and higher dipole moment that means that compound (3) adsorption occurs easily and is favored by the highest softness.
3.7 Chemical Structure of the Inhibitors and Corrosion Inhibition
Inhibition of the corrosion of C-steel in 2 M HCl solution by some thiophene 3-carbohydrazide derivatives is determined by potentiodynamic polarization and other methods, it was found that the inhibition efficiency depends on concentration, nature of metal, the mode of adsorption of the inhibitors and surface conditions. The observed corrosion data in presence of these inhibitors, namely: i) The decrease of corrosion rate and corrosion current with increase in concentration of the inhibitor ii) The linear variation of weight loss with time iii) The shift in Tafel lines to higher and lower potential regions iv) The decrease in corrosion inhibition with increasing temperature indicates that desorption of the adsorbed inhibitor molecules takes place and v) The inhibition efficiency was shown to depend on the number of adsorption active centers in the molecule and their charge densities. Polar character of substituents in the changing part of the inhibitor molecule seems to have a prominent effect on the electron charge density of the molecule. Metals such as Cu and Fe, which have a greater affinity towards aromatic moieties, were found to adsorb benzene rings in a flat orientation. The order of decreasing the inhibition efficiency of the investigated compounds in the corrosive solution was as follows:(3) > (2) > (1).
It is well known that the steel surface bears positive charge in acid solution [62], so it is difficult for the protonated molecules to approach the positively charged carbon steel surface due to the electrostatic repulsion. Since chloride ions have a smaller degree of hydration, thus they could bring excess negative charges in the vicinity of the interface and favor more adsorption of the positively charged inhibitor molecules, the protonated thiophene 3-carbohydrazide derivatives adsorb through electrostatic interactions between the positively charged molecules and the negatively charged metal surface. Thus there is a synergism between adsorbed Cl– ions and protonated thiophene 3-carbohydrazide derivatives. Thus we can conclude that inhibition of carbon steel corrosion in 2 M HCl is mainly due to electrostatic interaction. The decrease in inhibition efficiency with rise in temperature supports electrostatic interaction. In the second mode, since it is well known that the steel surface bears positive charge in acid solution [48, 49], so it is difficult for the protonated molecules to approach the positively charged carbon steel surface due to the electrostatic repulsion. Since chloride ions have a smaller degree of hydration, thus they could bring excess negative charges in the vicinity of the interface and favor more adsorption of the positively charged inhibitor molecules, the protonated thiophene azodyes adsorb through electrostatic interactions between the positively charged molecules and the negatively charged metal surface. Thus there is a synergism between adsorbed Cl– ions and protonated thiophene azodyes. Thus we can conclude that inhibition of carbon steel corrosion in 2 M HCl is mainly due to electrostatic interaction. The decrease in inhibition efficiency with rise in temperature supports electrostatic interaction.
Compound (3) exhibits excellent inhibition power due to: (i) its larger molecular size (341.41) that may facilitate better surface coverage, and (ii) the presence electron releasing groups (four N, one O and one S atoms) which enhance the delocalized π-electrons on the active centers of the compound. Compound (2) comes after compound (1) in inhibition efficiency because it has lesser molecular size (305.42) and one O, two S and three N atoms as active centers. Compound (3) has the lowest inhibition efficiency, this is due to it has the lowest molecular size (294.37).
4. Conclusions
The tested thiophene 3-carbohydrazide derivatives establish a very good inhibition for C- steel corrosion in HCl solution. Thiophene 3-carbohydrazide derivatives inhibit C- steel corrosion by adsorption on its surface and act better than the passive oxide film. The inhibition efficiency is in accordance to the order: (3) > (2) > (1). The inhibition efficiencies of the tested compounds increase with increasing of their concentrations. Double layer capacitances decrease with respect to blank solution when the inhibitor added. This fact may explained by adsorption of the inhibitor molecule on the C- steel surface. The adsorption of these compounds on carbon steel surface in HCl solution follows Langmuir adsorption isotherm. The values of inhibition efficiencies obtained from the different independent techniques showed the validity of the obtained results.
References
- M.A. Deyab,corros. Sci. 49(2007) 2315-2328
- S.A. Abd El-Maksoud A.S. Fouda, Mater.Chem.phys.93 (2005) 84-90
- K.F.Khaled, Mater. Chem.phys. 122(2008) 290-300
- G.Avci, Colloids Surf. A 317 (2008)730-736
- K.C.Pillali and R.Narayan, Corros.Sci. 23(1985)151
- A.B.Tadros and B.A.Abdel-Naby, J.Electroanal.Chem. 224(1988) 433.
- JO’M.Bockris and B.Yang, J.Electrochem.Soc. 138(1991) 2237.
- M.A. Khalifa,M.El-Batouti, F.Mhgoub,A.Bakr Aknish,Mater.Corrps.54(2003)251-258.
- Y.Abboud, A.Abourriche.T.Saffag,M.Berrada,M. Charrouf,A.Bennamara,N.Al Himidi and H. Hannache, Mater. Chem.phy.105 (2007) 1-5.
- K.F Khaled, Electrochim. Acta 48 (2003)2493-2503
- A. Popova M. Chistov, S. Raicheva and E. Sokolova, Corros. Sci 46(2004)1333-1350.
- J. Cruz, R. Mart´ınez, J. Genesca, and E. Garc´ıa-Ochoa,“Experimental and theoretical study of 1-(2-ethylamino)-2-methylimidazoline as an inhibitor of carbon steel corrosion in acid media,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, vol. 566, no. 1, pp. 111–121, 2004.
- A. M. S. Abdennabi, A. I. Abdulhadi, S. T. Abu-Orabi, and H. Saricimen, “The inhibition action of 1(benzyl)1-H-4,5-dibenzoyl-1,2,3-triazole on mild steel in hydrochloric acid media,” Corrosion Science, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 1791–1800, 1996.
- F. Bentiss,M. Traisnel, L. Gengembre, andM. Lagren´ee, “New triazole derivative as inhibitor of the acid corrosion of mild steel: electrochemical studies, weight loss determination, SEM and XPS,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 152, no. 3, pp. 237–249,1999.
- L. Wang, “Inhibition of mild steel corrosion in phosphoric acid solution by triazole derivatives,” Corrosion Science, vol.48, no. 3, pp. 608–616, 2006.
- S. Kertit and B. Hammouti, “Corrosion inhibition of iron in 1M HCl by 1-phenyl-5-mercapto-1,2,3,4-tetrazole,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 59–66, 1996.
- R. M. Hudson, T. J. Butler, and C. J. Warning, “The effect of pyrrole-halide mixtures in inhibiting the dissolution of low-carbon steel in sulphuric acid,” Corrosion Science, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 571–581, 1977.
- M. A. Veloz and I. G. Mart´ınez, “Effect of some pyridine derivatives on the corrosion behavior of carbon steel in an environment like NAGE TM0177,” Corrosion, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 283–292, 2006.
- A. Ouchrif, M. Zegmout, B. Hammouti, S. El-Kadiri, and A. Ramdani, “1,3-Bis(3-hyroxymethyl-5-methyl-1-pyrazole) propane as corrosion inhibitor for steel in 0.5 M H2SO4 solution,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 252, no. 2, pp. 339–344,2005.
- A. Chetouani, B. Hammouti, T. Benhadda, and M. Daoudi,“Inhibitive action of bipyrazolic type organic compounds towards corrosion of pure iron in acidic media,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 249, no. 1–4, pp. 375–385, 2005.
- S. A. Abd El-Maksoud, “The influence of some Arylazobenzoyl acetonitrile derivatives on the behaviour of carbon steel in acidic media,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 206, no. 1–4, pp.129–136, 2003.
- A. Chetouani, A. Aouniti, B. Hammouti, N. Benchat, T.Benhadda, and S. Kertit, “Corrosion inhibitors for iron in hydrochloride acid solution by newly synthesised pyridazine derivatives,” Corrosion Science, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 1675–1684,2003.
- M. Ohsawa and W. Su¨etaka, “Spectro-electrochemical studies of the corrosion inhibition of copper by mercaptobenzothiazole,”Corrosion Science, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 709–722, 1979.
- G. W. Walter, “A review of impedance plot methods used for corrosion performance analysis of painted metals,” Corrosion Science, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 681–703, 1986.
- B. Trachli, M. Keddam, H. Takenouti, and A. Srhiri, “Protective effect of electropolymerized 3-amino 1,2,4-triazole towards corrosion of copper in 0.5M NaCl,” Corrosion Science, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 997–1008, 2002.
- M. Hepel and M. Scendo, “Growth kinetics of multi-layer CuEtX films on copperpiezoelectrodes,” in Thin Films:Preparation, Characterization, Applications, M. P. Soriaga, J. Stickney, L. A. Bottomley, and Y.-G. Kim, Eds., Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, NY, USA, 2001.
- M. Hepel and M. Scendo, “Kinetics of CuEtX film formation on copper piezoelectrodes,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, vol. 538-539, pp. 121–132, 2002. International Journal of Corrosion 11
- M. Scendo, “Potassium ethyl xanthate as corrosion inhibitor for copper in acidic chloride solutions,” Corrosion Science, vol.47, no. 7, pp. 1738–1749, 2005.
- Bishir Usman1,2,Hasmerya Maarof1, Hassan H. Abdallah1,Rosmahaida Jamaludin, Abdo M. Al-Fakih1, Madzlan Aziz,Corrosion Inhibition Efficiency of Thiophene Derivatives on Mild Steel: A QSAR ,Model.Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 9 (2014) 1678 – 1689
- A.S. Fouda , H.A. Wahed, Corrosion inhibition of copper in HNO3 solution using thiophene and its derivatives, Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 2011, in press
- Sharfawati Che Soh, Madzlan Aziz Andrita Sundari, polarization behavior of carbon steel corrosion in strong acid media in the presence of methyl thiophene inhibitor Ind. J. Sci. Res. And Tech. 2014 2(2):25-30
- M.E. Matheus, L.F. Oliveira, A.C. Freitas, A.M. Carvalho and A.J. Barreiro. J. Med. Biol. 24(1991)1219–1222.
- R. W. Bosch, J. Hubrecht, W. F. Bogaerts, B. C. Syrett, Corrosion 57 (2001) 60-70
- S. S. Abdel–Rehim, K. F. Khaled, N. S. Abd–Elshafi. Electrochim. Acta 51 (2006) 3269.
- E.Stupnisek-Lisac, A.Gazivoda and M.Madzarac. J.Electrochim.Acta, 47 (2002) 4189.
- G.N.Mu,X.H.L and Q.Quand J.Zhou, Corros.Sci., 48(2006)445.
- Sinyashin,Corros. Sci. 53 (2011) 976.
- V.V. Torres, R.S. Amado, C.F. de Sá, T.L. Femandez, C.A. Da Silva Riehl, A.G.Torres, E. D’Elia,J. Corros. Sci. 53 (2011) 2385.
- T.P. Zhao, G.N. Mu, Corros. Sci. 41 (1999)1937.
- M.J. Bahrami, S.M.A. Hosseini, P. Pilvar, J. Corros. Sci. 52 (2010) 2793.
- I.B. Obot, N.O. Obi-Egbed, J. Appl. Electrochem. 40 (2010) 1977–1984.
- A. Ostovari, S.M. Hoseinieh, M. Peikari, S.R. Shadizadeh, S.J. Hashemi, Croros. Sci. 51 (2009) 1935–1949.
- M. Bouklah, B. Hammouti, M. Lagrenée, F. Bentiss, Corros. Sci. 48 (2006) 2831.
- F.M. Donahue, K. Nobe, J. Electrochem. Soc. 112 (1965)886.
- E. Kamis, F. Bellucci, R.M. Latanision, E.S.H. El-Ashry, Corrosion 47(1991) 677.
- X.H. Li, S.D. Deng, H. Fu, G.N. Mu, Corros. Sci. 52 (2010) 1167.
- Ishtiaque Ahamad, Rajendra Prasad and M.A. Quraishi, Corros. Sci., 52 (2010) 3033.
- G.N. Mu, T.P. Zhao, M. Liu and T. GU, Corrosion 52 (1996) 853.
- Ashish Kumar Singh and M.A. Quraishi, Corros. Sci., 52 (2010) 1529.
- M. Abdallah, Corros. Sci., 45 (2003) 2705.
- A.S. Fouda, A. A. Al-Sarawy and E.E.El-Katori, Desalination, 201(2006) 1.
- X.H. Li, S.D. Deng, H. Fu, G.N. Mu,Corros. Sci. 52 (2010) 1167.
- X.H. Li, S.D. Deng, H. Fu, G.N. Mu, Corros. Sci. 50 (2008) 2635.
- A. Döner, G. Kardas, N-Aminorhodanine Corros. Sci. 53 (2011) 4223.
- G.Moretti, G. Quartarone, A. Tassan, A. Zingales, J. Werkst. Korros. 45 (1994) 641.
- B.G. Ateya, B.E. El-Anadouli, F.M. El-Nizamv, Corros. Sci. 24 (1984) 509.
- F.H. Assaf, M. Abou-Krish, A.S. El-Shahawy, M.Th. Makhlouf, Hala Soudy, Int. J.Electrochem. Sci. 2 (2007) 169.
- I. Sekine, M. Sabongi, H. Hagiuda, T. Oshibe, M. Yuasa, T.Imahc, Y. Shibata, and T.Wake; J. Electrochem. Soc.; 139 (1992) 3167.
- L.Larabi, O.Benali, S.M.Mekelleche and Y.Harek, Appl.Surf.Sci., 253 (2006) 1371.
- M.Lagrenee, B.Mernari, B.Bouanis, M.Traisnel and F.Bentiss, Corros.Sci. 44 (2002) 573.
- G. A. Caigman, S. K. Metcalf, E. M. Holt, J.Chem. Cryst.30 (2000) 415.
- Ashish Kumar Singh and M.A. Quraishi, Corros. Sci., 52 (2010) 1529.
PDF Version of the article |
Flash Version of the article |
|
[qr-code size=”2″] |